About the Journal

1. Internet and E-Commerce;
2. Information Sytems;
3. Networking
4. Big Data;
5. Artficial Inteligence;
6. Algorithms and Programming;
7. Data Mining;
8. Typography;
9. Branding;
10. Design Thinking;
11. Visual Culture;
12. Photography;
13. Advertising;
14. Illustration;
15. Design;
16. Painting;

 

Section Policy

Articles

Open Access

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

 

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to this journal must adhere to the focus and scope, as well as the author guidelines of this journal. Submitted manuscripts must discuss scientific benefits or novelty that are in line with the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarised content. All authors are advised to use plagiarism detection software to check for similarities. 

Research articles submitted to this journal will be reviewed by reviewers with relevant expertise. Reviewers provide valuable scientific comments to improve the content of the manuscript.

The final decision on whether to accept an article will be made by the Editor based on the reviewers' comments. The publication of accepted articles, including the order in which they are published, will be determined by the Editor-in-Chief, taking into account the date of receipt, the geographical distribution of authors, and thematic issues.

Publication Frequency

Published twice a year, i.e. twice in one year.

Article Plagiarism

Every article to be published in the Journal of Information Technology and Visual Communication Design has a maximum plagiarism level of 25%. Plagiarism checks can be conducted independently through Turnitin. This is done to ensure that published articles are original works of the authors and not taken from the works of others.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides open access to its content based on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge exchange.

This journal is an open access journal, which means that all content is available free of charge to users or institutions. Users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full text articles in this journal without prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative.

Publication Ethics

JTD: Journal of Information Technology and Visual Communication Design is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Faculty of Computer Science, Selamat Sri University (UNISS) Kendal. This statement explains the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in posting articles in this journal, including authors, editors-in-chief, editorial boards, peer reviewers and publishers. This statement is based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines

The publication of articles in the peer-reviewed JTD: peer-review : Journal of Information Technology and Visual Communication Design (JTD) is an important foundation in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network.It is a direct reflection of the quality of the authors' work and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on the ethical standards expected of all parties involved in the publishing process: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.

The Faculty of Computer Science and Design  as the publisher of   JTD :  Journal of Information Technology and Visual Communication Design (JTD), takes its role in overseeing all stages of publication very seriously, and we recognise our ethical and other responsibilities.We are committed to ensuring that advertisements, reprints, or additional commercial revenue do not influence editorial decisions.Additionally, the Faculty of Computer Science and Design at UNISS Kendal and the Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and publishers where this is beneficial and necessary.

Publication Decisions

JTD Editors: The Journal of Information Technology and Visual Communication Design (JTD) is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work concerned and its importance to researchers and readers should always guide this decision. Editors may be guided by the journal's editorial board policy and constrained by legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content at all times, regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

No editor or editorial staff member may disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the author concerned, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the editor's own research without the author's written consent.

Reviewer Duties

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communication with authors, can also assist authors in improving their papers.

Timeliness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that a prompt review is not possible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They should not be shown or discussed with others unless authorised by the editor.

Objectivity Standards

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any assertion that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by the appropriate citation. Reviewers should also bring to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the papers.

Author Responsibilities

Reporting standards

Authors of original research reports should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or deliberately inaccurate statements constitute unethical and unacceptable behaviour.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide raw data associated with the paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to the data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), where possible, and should in any case be prepared to retain the data for a reasonable period after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work and that if they have used the work or words of others, these have been properly quoted or cited.

Multiple, Redundant, or Simultaneous Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same paper simultaneously to more than one journal is unethical and unacceptable publishing behaviour.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported.

Paper Writing

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made a significant contribution should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in specific substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

(This journal is currently under evaluation and monitoring by the Research and Community Service Office of Selamat Sri University as part of its internal improvement and oversight process to ensure the progress, integrity, and credibility of the journal.)

Publication Fee: 100,000 IDR

This journal does not charge any fees for the publication process.

ISSN : 2809-4662